Untouchable Mega Corruption?

Kasus Mega Korupsi Yang Sudah Sangat Transparan, dan Sangat Membebani Garuda. Kasus ini harus diusut karena sebesar US$ 470 juta dari US$ 748 juta utang Garuda berasal dari pembelian A330-300 tersebut. Artinya, Garuda hingga kini membayar utang hasil Mega Korupsi Mark Up, bukan membayar utang karena kebutuhan ekonomisnya.................

>>>Namun hingga saat ini belum tersentuh Aparat Penegak Hukum & Pemberantas Korupsi Republik Indonesia<<<

ADA APA DENGAN APARAT KITA?

MOHON DUKUNGAN MASYARAKAT & SEGENAP KARYAWAN GARUDA UNTUK MELAKUKAN KONTROL SOSIAL TERHADAP KASUS MEGA KORUPSI INI.

INFO PEDULI KITA

Jika kita memiliki info dan data-data sekitar kasus ini silakan mengirimkannya ke mega_dosa_garuda@yahoo.com kerahasiaan dan keamanan kita dijamin. "Kalau bukan kita siapa lagi?"

Sunday, April 20, 2003

Garuda Indonesia

Address:
Management Building
Garuda Maintenance Facility
Soekarno-Hatta Airport
Cenkareng
Indonesia

Telephone: (61) 21 231-2612
Fax: (62) 21 231-1962
http://www.garuda-indonesia.com

Statistics:
State-Owned Company
Incorporated: 1949
Employees: 9,000
Sales: $5.64 billion (2002 est.)
NAIC: 481111 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation; 481112 Scheduled Freight Air Transportation


Company Perspectives:
We have long been a driving force behind the remarkable development of tourism in Indonesia. Additionally, we are providing access from major overseas markets to all parts of the archipelago, simulating travel through vigorous promotion and pioneering development of tourist facilities. We support the government's objectives for national development through our flight routes, hotel and tourism subsidiaries. Dedicated employees who are determined to see the company evolve into a major Asian airline support us. The performance of Garuda now shows that not only has management successfully rescued and revived the airline, it has also discovered the right concept needed to manage the company.


Key Dates:
1949: Garuda begins operations with a single DC-3 flying Calcutta-Rangoon.
1984: Massive reorganizations orients Garuda toward an international market.
1998: New management is installed to cope with disastrous effects of Asian financial crisis.
2000: Deregulation greatly increases competition in the domestic market.
2003: Bali bombings, SARS, and Iraq war endanger Garuda's recovery.


Company History:
Garuda Indonesia is a major international and domestic airline that has been the flagship of Indonesia's airways for more than 50 years. As a state-owned company, Garuda's fortunes have always been entwined with the nation's as a whole, and economic development has always been a part of its mission. Aviation is a vital mode of transport for the archipelago nation made up of 1,700 islands. Garuda flies about six million passengers a year.

Origins

Although Indonesia proclaimed itself an independent republic in 1945, the nation continued to struggle with the Dutch until 1949. In October 1948, shortly before world recognition of Indonesia's independence, Garuda began humbly when a team of Indonesian Air Force officers purchased a single DC-3 Dakota from Singapore. The airline launched its maiden flight from Calcutta to Rangoon in January 1949. Named for a mythical Indonesian bird who saves a maiden from death, Garuda was charged by the government with fostering the nation's economic growth.

Development of an efficient air travel industry in Indonesia was crucial because of the country's unique geographic situation. Indonesia is the world's largest archipelago, stretching for more than 3,100 miles and comprising a series of more than 17,508 Southeast Asian islands, including Bali and Java. Nearly 6,000 of the islands are inhabited by a diverse ethnic population totaling over 170 million, and Garuda has acted as a domestic air link for the nation. In addition, Garuda's establishment of international flight routes has been partly responsible for developing the national tourism industry since the 1980s, when Indonesia began turning its focus away from the petroleum trade after the oil glut of that decade and sought to cultivate tourism as an alternative means of income.

In the early 1980s, Garuda began transferring domestic routes to one of its subsidiaries, Merpati Nusantara Airlines, also wholly owned by the government. Merpati served the well-established domestic routes and was also responsible for "pioneer" flights--providing links between smaller, less-developed cities and larger ones--in an effort to promote national expansion and efficient utilization of natural resources. Although many pioneer flights were forced to land on primitive dirt or grass runways, these trips were considered part of Merpati's mission as a state-owned company. With nearly 60 percent of its destinations classified as pioneer service, Merpati devoted about one-third of its fleet to these efforts. In return, the government provided subsidies for pioneer flights to make them more profitable.

International Focus in 1984

A massive reorganization in 1984 led to substantial growth in Garuda's international service as the company sought to position itself as a large-carrier-only airline. Although the airline had achieved international recognition as a major carrier, it was $1.3 billion in debt and suffering a corporate identity crisis. Its plans called for a new-aircraft purchase program, company-wide employee training, corporate development and expansion, and a new marketing strategy to build on its international position. Under new management, Garuda implemented its four-pronged attack and created a new logo and new uniforms to update its corporate image.

Under a fleet upgrade and expansion plan to take the company into the year 2000, the airline began ordering new aircraft. Indonesia's increasing deregulation of the industry in the late 1980s freed purchase decisions from government influence; former Garuda Indonesia president Moehamad Soeparno told an interviewer for Aviation Week & Space Technology that he "requested the freedom [from the government] to choose our own aircraft so we can operate in a professional manner." The company hired an outside consultant to advise management on the most appropriate mix of aircraft to meet their needs. The modernization included plans to add nine Boeing 747-400s by 1996 and to refurbish several of its existing large jets. Despite the modernization plan's $4 billion price tag, Garuda had managed to reduce its $1.3 billion debt to $260 million by the end of the decade.

In 1989, with the increasing deregulation of the airline industry, Garuda also accelerated its transfer of domestic routes to its subsidiary. Before that time, no airline besides Garuda Indonesia--including Merpati--was allowed to operate jet aircraft. Merpati's departures and passengers were expected to double by the time the transfer was completed, and the company's revenues were projected to increase by 200 percent. Such rapid growth was not absorbed easily, however. Merpati was forced to borrow pilots and technicians from its parent company until an overall staff increase of 50 percent could be achieved.

Expanding in the Early 1990s

The Garuda Indonesia overhaul paid off in sales and growth for the airline in the early 1990s. With a fleet of 75 of its own planes and several others leased to meet route demands, Garuda expanded its service to include 16 domestic destinations and 37 international cities on five continents. Market research for Garuda indicated that European travel to Indonesia was likely to increase six-fold by the year 2000. In a sales mission led by new president Wage Mulyono, appointed in January 1992, Garuda explored European options and added Munich to its list of destinations. According to the airline's research, Germany represented one of Indonesia's highest-yield markets for tourism; 20 percent of Germany's trade volume with the Association of Southeastern Asian Nations (ASEAN) was absorbed by Indonesia, and Germany ranked second behind only the United Kingdom in visitors to Indonesia. By adding a second German destination to its schedule (Frankfurt was established in 1965), Garuda predicted that Germany would eventually become the single largest source of tourists to Indonesia. Future plans included expansion of routes to Houston, Montreal, and Vancouver.

While Garuda Indonesia aggressively pursued foreign markets, it continued to serve domestic passengers with its own routes or those of its Merpati subsidiary. One of the most important air services the carrier offered each year took the form of flights during hajj, the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca. Among Indonesia's 300 ethnic groups is a large Islamic population for whom the journey to Mecca during hajj season is critical. Garuda served the needs of Indonesia's Muslim community with flights that were challenging yet lucrative for the carrier. According to Aviation Week & Space Technology, hajj flights--which take place during a compressed two-month period determined by the Muslim calendar--have made up as much as 10 percent of the company's annual revenues. The challenge for Garuda was to maintain its regular service on established routes and also to meet the demands of inflexible hajj-flight scheduling, since all hajj passengers had to arrive before the annual pilgrimage began. Scheduled as frequently as every hour, flights to Mecca were full on arrival and empty on the return flight; after the pilgrimage, the pattern was reversed. The airline also made special customer-service arrangements during this period, including a pre-flight passenger briefing in several dialects for those who had never flown before and seat assignments by area of origin. By leasing extra aircraft and entering cooperative agreements with charters, Garuda transported an estimated 80,000 hajj passengers per season in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Early in its history, Garuda Indonesia had sought assistance from established airlines and joined commercial associations to gain training and expertise. As it entered the 1990s, Garuda had grown so much in both size and expertise that it was a model airline for other growing carriers in the Asian region. The airline built the Garuda Indonesia Training Centre to provide complete training for all airline operations, including flight crew, engineering, maintenance, traffic, in-flight service, and sales. The center also included a modern language laboratory to facilitate communication with international customers. Using the center as a training ground for its large numbers of Indonesian-recruited employees, Garuda also opened the facility to other carriers--such as Finnair, Malaysia Airlines, Korean Air, and Philippine Airlines--to share its mastery of high maintenance and service standards. With these extensive facilities, including the largest hangar in the world, Garuda also began bidding for maintenance contracts with other airlines. In addition to building a state-of-the-art training center, Garuda enhanced its customer service with a central computer-based booking system in 1988. The system linked Garuda offices and those of its subsidiaries in more than 80 cities around the world. In early 1992, Garuda began considering purchasing part interest in two Australian airlines, Qantas and Australian Airlines.

As the parent company of a major group that included accommodations and tourism as well as air transport, Garuda's diversity in the early 1990s continued to fulfill its mission of economic development and expansion for Indonesia. The company co-sponsored a Visit Indonesia 1991 campaign that was predicted to double tourist arrivals to 2.5 million by 1993. Through its subsidiaries, Garuda also began to market controlled, environmentally conscious vacations to Indonesia's unspoiled natural areas. Mulyono elaborated upon the link between company and national goals in the airline's in-flight magazine: "It is our policy, as Indonesia's national carrier, to be involved in the total travel experience to the benefit of visitors to our country and to contribute to the foreign exchange earnings which are so important in improving the national infrastructure. This will also be beneficial to visitors as these earnings will be used to improve road, rail, and telephone services which are badly needed to boost the overall communications system."

Trouble in the Mid-1990s

Rising fuel and maintenance costs led to losses of Rp342.79 billion in 1995 and Rp87.44 billion in 1996. At the same time, Garuda was trying to expand. Heeding calls for more cargo capacity, the airline made arrangements to double its long-haul fleet with a $1.6 billion order for 23 Boeing airliners in 1996. Most of this would be cancelled; after the Asian financial crisis, Garuda would instead bolster air freight capacity through marketing deals with Korean Air, Martinair, China Airlines, and Air France.

The government was planning to partially privatize the airline through an initial public offering (IPO), which was originally scheduled for 1997 and put off until 1998. To prepare for the IPO, Garuda began to sell off non-core units. Its two hotels, managed by the PT Aerowisata subsidiary, were sold in April 1997.

Garuda was hit hard by the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. It suffered both from unfavorable currency valuations (most of its costs were in U.S. dollars) and from a falloff in tourism. To survive, the airline sold off 20 planes, cancelled orders, and closed money-losing routes, including all those to the United States. Layoffs were put off until the fall of 1998; 3,000 of 13,000 employees were cut. Fares were also raised. Still, the crisis left Garuda with a debt of $1.8 billion. New management was installed in November 1998, and the new team was able to restore profitability within a year. The airline was seen as a model of recovery.

In 1999, Garuda saw its first profit in a decade, Rp548 billion ($62 million). The airline was flying about six million passengers a year. It posted sales of 9.279 trillion rupiah in 2000, up from 7.541 trillion the previous year. Net profit was Rp77.9 billion. Garuda began to reopen some of the 17 international routes that had been closed in the wake of the Asian financial crisis and secured a leasing deal for seven Boeing 737s to replace lost capacity.

The Asian financial crisis cut domestic passenger counts (and airline fleets) in half and grounded one local carrier, Sempati Air. The Indonesian government responded by deregulating the air market. A half-dozen start-up airlines appeared in the domestic market in 2000 and 2001, adding to the handful of established airlines.

After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, some European governments issued travel advisories warning tourists to avoid Indonesia, which was home to some small but highly vocal radical Islamic groups. However, Garuda was able to hold on to profitability. It posted a profit of $60 million (Rp503 billion) in 2002 on sales of about $5.6 billion.

Plans for privatization were still alive, though deferred till 2003. In August 2003, Garuda announced plans to spin off its maintenance business, with 2,750 related employees, as well as other non-core units, as part of the privatization preparations.

More Challenges in the 2000s

After a couple of years of a promising recovery from the Asian financial crisis, Garuda ran at a loss in the first half of 2003 as the worldwide travel industry suffered from bombings in Bali, the SARS epidemic, and the war in Iraq. At the same time, Garuda was experiencing relentless price competition at home from a crop of nearly two dozen "bare bones" domestic airlines, reported Britain's Financial Times. Garuda controlled about 50 percent of the domestic market, though its operating margins had been cut in half. The domestic market was expanding but had yet to return to pre-1996 levels.

In September 2003, Garuda began a marketing arrangement with Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) that effectively established the Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur (KL) as an external hub for Garuda's long-haul international operations. In other parts of the deal, the carriers were working together to increase traffic between KL and Jakarta and hoped to eventually share aircraft maintenance and information technology resources.

Principal Subsidiaries: PT Aerowisata; PT Abacus Distribution System Indonesia (95%); PT Capura Angkasa (60%).

Principal Competitors: Lion Air; Singapore Airlines Ltd.; Thai Airways; Malaysian Airline System Ltd.

Saturday, February 1, 2003

Pilot pay dispute more turbulence for Garuda

Southeast Asia
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/EB01Ae04.html

Feb 1, 2003

Pilot pay dispute more turbulence for Garuda
By Bill Guerin

Turbulence over pilots' salaries is shaking up Garuda's efforts to soar into clear business skies as Indonesia's national carrier tries to avert a strike that would disrupt flights.

Garuda pilots have agreed to hold off the "labor slowdown" and negotiate with manpower minister Jacob Nuwa Wea about wages.

From the outset, however, Garuda has played hardball, claiming it cannot afford the Rp47.1 million to Rp88.8 million (US$5,300-$10,000) a month demanded by the pilots because of its huge debt obligations. Amid veiled threats of bringing in foreign pilots to break any strike, the airline countered with an offer of between Rp13 million and Rp24.6 million a month ($1,460-$2,770). These figures are all take-home pay, as the company pays the taxes.

Still 100 percent government-owned, Garuda operates 41 aircraft, carries almost 6 million passengers a year and employs about 9,000 people. It flew about 40 percent of last year's lower-than-expected total of 5 million domestic air travelers, taking them to 21 domestic destinations.

The slim-down from 83 aircraft and a workforce of 15,000 people over the past two years is part of the shakeup that followed the onset of the regional financial crisis. In 1998, with negative capital of almost $235 million, $1.8 billion in foreign and domestic debts, and rampant corruption, Garuda was already technically bankrupt.

The carrier incurred massive losses partly from operating unprofitable routes to the United States and Europe. Reducing several of these routes led to over-employment and excess flight capacity. A more traditional way of losing money was from deep-seated corruption within the airline. Malpractice and lack of supervision caused losses of $721 million between 1995 and 1999. As with many other Indonesian state enterprises, opacity, not transparency, ruled.

Garuda is no stranger to elite and government control and was never a commercial enterprise proper. For most of the 32 years of the Suharto regime, the former first family and their cronies treated the airline almost as their own private company, bullying management into commercially unsound practices that benefited only those who rented the Garuda cash cow.

One case exposed by Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW) was when Garuda, led by then company president Soeparno, leased nine aircraft without proper feasibility studies beforehand. Garuda officials colluded with the two lessors involved to mark up the contract so that the carrier had to pay more, inflicting losses of about $1 billion in the process.

Suharto's son Tommy, along with Chinese timber tycoon Bob Hasan, who are now in adjoining cells in prison, also succeeded in bringing grief to the national flag carrier. In 1989 the pair bought a majority share of a poorly run charter airline from a holding company controlled by the armed forces, Sempati Air. This was built, by sheer force of collusion, corruption and nepotism, into the first privately owned Indonesian airline to break the Garuda monopoly of international routes and jet-powered aircraft.


Garuda domestic airfares had been pegged at artificially low levels by legislative decrees, most international routes lost money and without massive government subsidies the carrier would have gone belly-up.

Hit by a drastic fall in tourist and business traffic brought on by the Asian financial crisis, the government pushed Garuda for a new strategy of retrenchment to stop the bleeding and start filling up the coffers again. The steep fall of the rupiah during the crisis had caused the airline's dollar-based debt to soar and its passenger load factor to plunge.

Almost 80 percent of its operating costs at the time were in dollars and Garuda made sizable losses (and gains), purely on the vagaries of a wildly fluctuating rupiah. In 1999, when the rupiah had settled down into some semblance of stability the airline recorded a foreign-exchange gain of Rp114.34 billion.

Robby Djohan took over the helm in June 1998 and brought into force a new paradigm for the ailing airline, and a total restructuring plan meant to ready it for privatization in 2003.

Historically, 1998 was the year of consolidation and averting bankruptcy. The year 1999 would target rehabilitation proper and an improvement in its overall operation performance. The year 2000 would see a badly needed focus on service, 2001 would be notable for improvements in efficiency and finally, in 2002, Garuda would be ready to expand its routes, products, services and its fleet and reopen several of its international routes that were closed.

Next came an interim restructuring plan, which saw a sharp reduction in international flights to Bali, especially from its major markets Australia, Europe and Japan, and hefty discounts for international and domestic travelers to the island.

In yet another management reshuffle a few months later, Djohan was poached by the government to take over the helm at Bank Mandiri, a new bank being formed out of the merger of four state-owned banks.

Abdulgani, onetime chief of listed Bank Duta, who had been learning the ropes from Laksamana's predecessor, Tanri Abeng, became the new captain at Garuda in October 1998.

By June 2000, Abdulgani told lawmakers from the powerful Commission IV of the House of Representatives in a parliamentary hearing that he had been able to do little about tackling KKN (corruption, collusion and nepotism), that had caused the airline, and thus the state, losses exceeding $1 billion. He excused his failure by saying his main priority was to keep Garuda afloat.

Abdulgani, and Djohan in his short tenure, virtually turned the airline around and got it flying straight and level. The poor international image was improved by better standards of safety and reliability, expediting the check-in process, and better communication with customers, which, in turn, heralded a new, though unfamiliar, era of customer loyalty to the national carrier.

The payoff came with international awards for outstanding punctuality and safety records at the turn of the century. This was an impressive achievement but other parts of the master plan dug even deeper. Heavy layoffs, a restructuring of employee benefit and incentive schemes, and a complete rehash of domestic and international routes was quickly under way.

Abdulgani left in January last year but was not replaced until May. State Enterprises Minister Laksamana Sukardi, a senior member of President Megawati Sukarnoputri's Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-Perjuangan), had been pressing for his brother Samudera to get the post.

After months of public outcry and cries of nepotism the government appointed the present holder, Indra Setiawan to the post.

On the domestic front, amid stiff competition from newcomers, Garuda has captured 40 percent of the market through a strategy of going after the "fat" routes, while leaving the loss making distant domestic destinations and other pioneering efforts to the upstarts.

Garuda's competitors include a number of new players as well as the already established airlines, including Merpati Nusantara Airlines, Bouraq and Dirgantara Air Service who, along with the national flag carrier, control over 60 percent of the domestic market. The current 15 airlines fly a total of 153 aircraft. In 1998, six airlines operated 106 aircraft.

Most of the action centers on the more lucrative routes including Jakarta-Surabaya, Jakarta-Denpasar, Jakarta-Yogyakarta, Jakarta-Semarang, Jakarta-Solo, Jakarta-Medan, Jakarta-Makassar, Jakarta-Balikpapan and Jakarta-Manado, where Garuda claims a load factor of between 70 and 75 percent.

Bali Air, launched last September, was the first low-cost "no-frills" airline in Indonesia and achieves an average load factor of 70 percent on its premier Jakarta-Surabaya route. Star Air, launched the year before, claims an average load factor of 80 percent on its Jakarta-Medan route.

Garuda has ignored the domestic fare war sparked off by competitors, claiming it has never used price as a marketing tool. Just as well, as industry sources recently warned that the current discounts of up to 50 percent on domestic fares may eventually lead to the demise of the airline industry, because revenue from flights is well below the minimum required operating costs.

Unlike Europe and North America, where a load factor of 35 percent can commonly generate a profit, experts say that an Indonesian carrier with load factor of 135 percent may not even reach break-even point.

Unfortunately, in its fourth year of the program, when Garuda planned to revamp its entire service, the bombers struck in Bali (see Bali tragedy clips Garuda's wings, November 13, 2002. Garuda's international flights took the brunt of the Bali bombing as 60-70 percent of its flights land at or depart from Denpasar, Bali.

A year earlier Garuda had farsightedly set up a second hub in Denpasar for its international flights, in addition to its existing Jakarta hub now used by Garuda only for domestic destinations.

Management had worked it out that foreigners visiting Indonesia had been reluctant to disembark in Jakarta due to security reasons and set up the Bali hub to receive direct international flights to Denpasar, servicing 21 international routes from Japan, Australia, and Europe.

The Bali bombings hit the national flag carrier where it hurts. International sales at the time made up some 60 percent of Garuda's total revenue and the airline had to shift rapidly into cost cutting mode to limit the impact on its profitability and its ensuing capacity to meet debt repayments.

The average passenger load factor on Garuda international flights quickly fell below 40 percent, half that before the October 12 bombings.

Post-Bali, Garuda stepped up flights to Shanghai and Guangzhou as well as Taipei to underpin the focus on domestic and Asia-Pacific routes. The Shanghai route, announced this week, is Garuda's third to China after Guangzhou and Hong Kong, and is expected to help expand market access to other cities in China, such as Beijing and Xiamen.

Garuda's position among the 20 or so international carriers with hubs in Asia remains weak. Like other government-owned airlines such as Malaysia Airlines and Philippine Airlines, they fight an uphill battle to poach passengers from the stronger, private players, such as Singapore Airlines, Qantas and Cathay Pacific.

The company has recently handed back three leased 747s that serviced routes to Australia, Japan and Europe but on the Jakarta-Denpasar route have upgraded their aircraft to wide-bodied jets.

Though the carrier is now under professional management, political interference looms at every turn and the debt needs to be restructured yet again.

Setiawan said just after the Bali incident that Garuda was not in any rush to seek a rescheduling of its $1.2 billion debt, preferring to rely on the understanding of creditors, the biggest of which is the European Credit Agency (ECA). Garuda owes $610 million to the ECA. "Hopefully, creditors will understand our situation and appreciate our efforts to survive," he said.

The pilots, pressured by the airline and politicians, may also need to appreciate the airline's determination to survive.

Garuda say their pilots currently get between Rp7.9 million and Rp22.8 million ($890-$2,570) a month. Only about 6.6 percent of Garuda employees are pilots but their salaries account for a fifth of the airline's monthly salary budget.

Even if the demands were met in full it would only put pilots on a par with the recently announced Jakarta city councilors' salaries of Rp90 million a month. Hardly a matter of pride for an airline that has pulled itself back into relatively clear skies against all odds.

(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)